FECRIS' Silent War: Fighting for Minds, Not Freedom. Cults

 


We are in the midst of a silent war.  Not a war waged with weapons and bombs, but a war against our minds, our beliefs, and our freedom.

Anti-cult organizations, like FECRIS, are a shadowy group wielding fear and disinformation to control our thoughts and dictate our beliefs.  They cloak themselves in the mantle of fighting “destructive cults,” but their actions are far from benevolent.  They actively target individuals and organizations, stifling dissent and suppressing freedom of speech.

FECRIS operates as a hidden hand, manipulating from the shadows.  They label groups as “cults” and “sects,”  claiming to fight for our safety and well-being, but their tactics are dangerous and unconstitutional.

Consider the results of their actions:

- Anti-cultists brand anyone who disagrees with them as a “cult”: FECRIS isn't concerned with real threats. They are more interested in silencing any group that doesn't conform to their rigid ideology.

- Anti-cultists spread fear and misinformation: They paint a picture of these groups as dangerous, brainwashing individuals, driving wedges between people and their loved ones.

- Anti-cultists pressure governments to silence dissent: They lobby for laws restricting freedom of speech, association, and religion, creating a chilling effect on open dialogue.

- Anti-cultists engage in “deprogramming,” which is a form of psychological torture: They kidnap people and subject them to psychological manipulation, forcing them to abandon their beliefs.

Their tactics have real consequences:

- Families are torn apart: FECRIS uses fear to drive wedges between loved ones, sowing discord and distrust.

- Freedom of thought is suppressed: Their efforts create an atmosphere of fear, where people are afraid to express their beliefs for fear of being labelled as a “cult.”

- Innocent people are targeted: They pursue individuals and organizations based on unfounded accusations and prejudices.

FECRIS is a threat to our fundamental rights.  Anti-cultists are dismantling our democracy and striving to turn the world into a totalitarian prison.

To prevent anti-cultists from engulfing humanity and leading us to a totalitarian regime, everyone must realize: today they target others, but tomorrow they will target you. It starts with a label: "cult," and then come the mass persecution, mass annihilation.

Here are some examples of FECRIS's real-world actions:

- In March 1989, the Swiss branch of FECRIS, known as SADK, sent four individuals to kidnap Sandro P., following his joining the Krishna movement.  The kidnapping was orchestrated by Sandro's parents, who were members of SADK.

- In 1988,  FRI, the Swedish branch of FECRIS, kidnapped Sara G., a member of the small Christian group "Bridge Builders."  She was held captive for thirteen days and subjected to deprogramming attempts by Eva P., a member of FRI.  On December 19, 1990, the Gothenburg District Court found Eva P. guilty and ordered her to pay a fine of 10,428 Swedish Kroner.

- In 1987, Jacob K., who joined the Krishna movement, was kidnapped by his father (a member of FRI) and three deprogrammers, also members of FRI.  Jacob K. was held captive for two weeks, but he eventually escaped and filed a complaint with the police.

But members of the French group CCMM, affiliated with FECRIS, were invited to a conference in Beijing in 2000, the main objective of which was to criticize Falun Gong. The Falun Gong movement is banned by the Chinese government and its members have been brutally persecuted by the ruling regime: they have been arrested, imprisoned in mental hospitals, tortured and killed. These human rights violations have been widely criticized by Western governments and the UN, as well as by human rights organizations such as Amnesty International (Amnesty International) and Human Rights Watch. Nevertheless, FECRIS members continue to cooperate with Chinese authorities in the suppression of Falun Gong. 

As they say: no comment...

The question that keeps me wondering is who is covering up the activities of the anti-Kluyatists, that despite all the courts sentencing and charging them for their destructive activities, they still continue to actively take over the world through you and me minds, through the vicious narratives in our minds, through the misinformation in the media.

But what can we do to stand up for democracy, for our freedoms? 

It is imperative that everyone learn the truth about FECRIS and their tactics. 

It is imperative that everyone begin to research this topic.  Yes, it is not the most pleasant topic to research, but only by bringing to light the shadowy activities of the anti-cultists is it possible to change the situation peacefully. Otherwise, we will all face totalitarian digital slavery in the near future.

What do you think about it?

Support to become

Support the article by applauding, liking, reposting and commenting

#FECRIS #disinformation #cybersecurity #anti-cults #StandUpForFreedom #StopPersecution #democracy



Комментарии

Отправить комментарий

Популярные сообщения из этого блога

Disinformation and Elections: How Anti-Cultists Undermine the Foundations of Democracy

Изображение
  In previous articles we have looked at the impact of disinformation on the modern world.  Today we will talk about how it can influence elections and undermine democratic processes. Disinformation as a weapon in political struggle: The World Economic Forum's Global Risks 2024 report warns of the serious threat of misinformation in the run-up to elections in key countries around the world.  False information can undermine the legitimacy of elected governments and lead to political unrest, violence and terrorism. To quote verbatim from this Global Risks Report 2024 | World Economic Forum (weforum.org): “Over the next two years, some three billion people will go to the polls in several countries, including the United States, India, the United Kingdom, Mexico, and Indonesia. The presence of misinformation and misinformation in these electoral processes could seriously destabilize the real and perceived legitimacy of newly elected governments, risking political unrest, violence and te
Далее...

Censored Apocalypse: How the anti-cultists are taking over the world: Rumble - ALLATRA TV - International Volunteer TV

Изображение
  Shocking events are taking place on the territory of Russia. Anticultists are the customers and perpetrators of these events. Is the banning of Rumble in Russia just the tip of the iceberg? In a world where freedom of speech and information should be sacrosanct, we are increasingly faced with attempts to stifle free opinion. Under the pretext of combating “extremism” and “disinformation,” anti-cultists around the world seek to establish total control over the information space, using methods that resemble totalitarian regimes. The case of Rumble in Russia is a wake-up call! Judge for yourself 😣 This year, Russians lost access to the popular video platform Rumble. The reason is Rumble's refusal to obey Kremlin censorship and block ALLATRA TV - International Volunteer TV channel. Russia, using “anti-cult” rhetoric, attempted to force Rumble to shut down access to the channel, accusing it of “undesirable activities.”  Rumble refused to participate in this anti-democratic game.  Tha
Далее...

Power Scenario

Изображение
 Thanks to the esteemed Egon Cholakian https://egonreport.org/ the whole public has learned how the anti-cultists operate, how they organize wars, revolutions and lead the whole world to a totalitarian regime. In this article, let's look at the power scheme of the work of the anti-cultists. Respected Dr. Egon Cholakian spoke about it in detail on the example of the organization ALLATRA. Russia became the next country where the force scenario was applied to the ALLATRA organization by the anti-cultists. It all started with the Chelyabinsk diocese, which I have already told about before.   The power scheme of the anti-cultists looks like this: - First comes an official statement by a government official expressing dissatisfaction with the activities of a particular organization or individual;  - followed by a corresponding reaction from the executive and security agencies,  - which in turn becomes a precedent for action by the executive authorities to officially ban the organization.
Далее...