How Anti-Cultists Use Ministries of Education to Poison Children's Minds


 Anti-cultists don't simply discredit different groups and organizations; they poison the minds of our children, instilling in them the false idea that "cultists" are enemies who must be fought. This hatred and intolerance can have devastating consequences for our society.

I am astonished how such organizations promote their ideas through Ministries of Education in different countries.

Here are some concrete examples:

GSK, a subdivision of FECRIS, receives funding from the Vienna Municipal Administration as well as from the Lower Austria government's department dealing with families. Until 2005, GSK also received subsidies from the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs and Consumer Protection.

These facts indicate that anti-cultists are not only advancing in society, but are also under the wing of governments, receiving financial support and pushing their ideology through educational institutions.

In Austria, the Parent Council (Elternbeirat), a FECRIS subdivision consulted by the Ministry of Education  on various matters, focuses on the "problem of cults." This leads to the appearance of brochures and programs in educational institutions that present certain groups and organizations as "dangerous" and "psychologically destructive."

In Germany, AGPF (Campaign for Mental and Psychological Freedom), which is indicated as a contact organization in numerous government information brochures about cults, operates under the wing of the Ministry of Education  of the Mecklenburg-Vorpommern region. EGMR (Lower Saxony Parents Initiative Against Religious Abuse) is also a registered association, whose representatives have rarely appeared in public. However, their brochures with false claims about small religious communities are distributed in the Thuringia region.

In Serbia, anti-cultists use the Institute for Educational Development (IRO), which is involved in the professional development of teachers and the preparation of curricula.

In Slovakia, Alexander Dvorkin, leader of an anti-cult group, received an honorary doctorate from one of the universities.

As the esteemed Egon Cholakian said, "This fact directly points to the fact that these educational institutions are used to train collaborators and recruit new agents of influence for the dark side. This, in turn, is no longer just a disturbing sign, but a direct threat to the foundations of a democratic society and a serious signal for the country's intelligence agencies."

We must understand that anti-cultists do not protect us; they are dangerous. Their actions not only undermine freedom but also create an atmosphere of intolerance and fear.

Everyone should understand how anti-cultists operate so that the whole world does not turn into a totalitarian concentration camp through their efforts...

Support the article with likes, reposts, comments, and applause.

#AntiCult #disinformation #FreedomOfReligion #Democracy #HumanRights #Disinformation #FreedomOfSpeech #Truth #Justice #Accountability


Комментарии

Отправить комментарий

Популярные сообщения из этого блога

Disinformation and Elections: How Anti-Cultists Undermine the Foundations of Democracy

Изображение
  In previous articles we have looked at the impact of disinformation on the modern world.  Today we will talk about how it can influence elections and undermine democratic processes. Disinformation as a weapon in political struggle: The World Economic Forum's Global Risks 2024 report warns of the serious threat of misinformation in the run-up to elections in key countries around the world.  False information can undermine the legitimacy of elected governments and lead to political unrest, violence and terrorism. To quote verbatim from this Global Risks Report 2024 | World Economic Forum (weforum.org): “Over the next two years, some three billion people will go to the polls in several countries, including the United States, India, the United Kingdom, Mexico, and Indonesia. The presence of misinformation and misinformation in these electoral processes could seriously destabilize the real and perceived legitimacy of newly elected governments, risking political unrest, violence and te
Далее...

Censored Apocalypse: How the anti-cultists are taking over the world: Rumble - ALLATRA TV - International Volunteer TV

Изображение
  Shocking events are taking place on the territory of Russia. Anticultists are the customers and perpetrators of these events. Is the banning of Rumble in Russia just the tip of the iceberg? In a world where freedom of speech and information should be sacrosanct, we are increasingly faced with attempts to stifle free opinion. Under the pretext of combating “extremism” and “disinformation,” anti-cultists around the world seek to establish total control over the information space, using methods that resemble totalitarian regimes. The case of Rumble in Russia is a wake-up call! Judge for yourself 😣 This year, Russians lost access to the popular video platform Rumble. The reason is Rumble's refusal to obey Kremlin censorship and block ALLATRA TV - International Volunteer TV channel. Russia, using “anti-cult” rhetoric, attempted to force Rumble to shut down access to the channel, accusing it of “undesirable activities.”  Rumble refused to participate in this anti-democratic game.  Tha
Далее...

Power Scenario

Изображение
 Thanks to the esteemed Egon Cholakian https://egonreport.org/ the whole public has learned how the anti-cultists operate, how they organize wars, revolutions and lead the whole world to a totalitarian regime. In this article, let's look at the power scheme of the work of the anti-cultists. Respected Dr. Egon Cholakian spoke about it in detail on the example of the organization ALLATRA. Russia became the next country where the force scenario was applied to the ALLATRA organization by the anti-cultists. It all started with the Chelyabinsk diocese, which I have already told about before.   The power scheme of the anti-cultists looks like this: - First comes an official statement by a government official expressing dissatisfaction with the activities of a particular organization or individual;  - followed by a corresponding reaction from the executive and security agencies,  - which in turn becomes a precedent for action by the executive authorities to officially ban the organization.
Далее...